OverDeeWall-March 8th

Over Dee Wall – March 8th Live Stream

TLDR: An interview with Over Dee Wall and Gabriel. Gabriel explains how the Irish politicians are misleading the public despite being well informed by the letters that he has sent.

The 1st part of the live stream Gabriel reads out his most recent letter to the Taoiseach. He is highlighting that the information on the AIC leaflets that were sent through letterboxes in Tralee were in accordance with what the HSE stated in Freedom of information requests.

The 2nd part of the live stream Gabriel explains how Leo Varadkar and Michael D Higgins fucked up and must now wait for Gemma and John’s case to be decided in the supreme court before commencing with further Covid legislation.

The 3rd part of this interview he explains your rights under the constitution.

CUC (All You Need To Remember)

  • I do not consent
  • I do not not understand
  • I have no contract with you

and…

“If you arrest me with a pretend charge then my fee is €1000 an hour”

TLDR

If you are sitting on a bus and a policeman approaches you and starts asking you for your personal details and stating that you can’t travel more than 5km.

All you need to say to them politely is “can you confirm for me that you are a Garda under oath?”. If the policeman says he is. Then all you have to say is “I’m asking you now to uphold my rights to travel on a lawful journey on the bus and not ask me anymore questions”. That’s it, full stop.

You don’t have to have any further conversation because it’s like the saying goes a shut mouth catches no flies. The police can not interrogate you under your rights in the constitution. Their oath is to uphold and protect the constitution, not NPHET or Dáil laws.

So rather than having an argument and maybe losing your cool where things could go wrong, just be nice and polite “I want my rights under the constitution, I have nothing more to say”.

If the policeman wants to take it further and arrest you, once again be polite but firm. Explain to them (the words are important) “I do not understand any charge“. In the language of the court “understandmeans that you are accepting the charges. In this case you have accepted an invitation for the court to have a chat with you.

The only time a policeman can send you to court is if you commit criminal offence such as assaulting a person. Anything relating to fines such as “did you walk 5 or 6 km” is a civil matter. They can only get you into court on a contract, because the court works on contract law.

If you say simply “I do not understand“, in legal terms it simply means “I do not accept any charges”. That’s why the words have to be very clear. “I do not understand”.

Also if they do try to arrest you, the correct words are “I do not consent to unlawful arrest, and if I am detained my fee is 1000 euro an hour“. This is all perfectly legal. So if the police decide to arrest you on a civil matter that you refuse to accept. That policeman is actually breaking the law and he will have to pay you 1000 euro an hour.

Interview Link

[2:00] Dee Wall: 4689 have watched the HSE whistle blower video since 12 O’Clock last night. This was on overdeewall.com.

It is currently on over 308,455 views on this video.

[4:00] DW: People are getting desperate for clarity, I know they are, but what I want to talk to you about here today is to share this video with the Irish in Manchester. We need this to go viral everywhere. Get it out on Youtube,BrandNewtube,Bitchute,Gab or wherever else you can get it. You got to show it to the nannies on the buses, I don’t care where you show it but please just share it.

Today I spoke to another nurse on the same Covid ward as the whistleblower. The whole ward had two patients with flu like symptoms. They tell us that nurses are working so hard in the Covid wards.

What We Are Going To Talk About Today Is

[7:00] DW: We want to speak about this councillor in County Kerry. Why? Because he is telling all of you people that you are conspiracy theorists.

The county councillor Johnie Wall in Tralee went on breakingnews.ie to discredit the ACI leaflets that were put out. These leaflets were to educate people on the dangers of taking this experimental trial drug.

He tried to use Gemma O’Doherty in his attempt to discredit the ACI leaflet. She is their punching bag for getting the truth out.

Gabe will explain how Johnnie Wall actually discredited himself.

[10:00] Gabe: In march last year I started writing to people about what I consider to be 2 important issues. The first one was to help people understand the medical misinformation propagated by media outlets such as RTE.

The second is to help you the people understand what your constitution actually means. This will be the main focus. I hope to do a few more streams about the meaning of the constitution so that you will know what to say when the police approach you on the footpath with lies. You need to know what to say in these situations.

There have been many in government that have been leading you with false information from the very beginning. I’m going to read to you a letter that I sent to the Taoiseach .

I asked him what we are going to do about this false information that was spread by this Fianna Faill councillor, not just on breakingnew.ie but all the main papers in Kerry.

I will read to you what the Taoiseach has already read in this letter.

[12:35]

Politicians Misleading The Public

Dear Taoiseach,

I recently brought to your attention that NPHET and RTE are committing medical fraud each day by stating false and misleading death figures. They cause fear and penchant concern of safety. For many months I have stated that these figures figures, 3 days in a row where they say

41 further deaths, it turned out it was 0 for that day. As breakdowns showed that they already reported the same in other months.

The next day stated 55 further deaths which actually turned out to be just 1 for that day.

This along with 54 other corrections from other months. I have reported this to you many times already. The figures show no 60% adjustment for the falsified figures that were reported.

Gabe (speaks directly): “Now I’ve written to the Taoiseach 14 times asking why we still have false figures many months later that were not reduced by the 60%”

The following pattern of false misleading fear figures is a serious offence. It is actually five years jail under the criminal law act of 1976.

Today the public was shocked by Fianna Fail councillor Johnny Wall misleading the public. This person stated on breakingnews.ie and all the local Tralee papers “Anti-vaccine leaflets dismissing coronavirus as a global conspiracy and an attempt to set up a police state”. That action must be taken against “these conspiracy leaflets“. When in actual fact they state more or less the exact same information that the HSE signed documents that I sent to the Taoiseach already.

He goes on to say that he objects to instructions on how to say the Rosary. Fianna Faill have prevented people from saying the Rosary etc in churches, it is currently only allows non catholics to practice religion.

Gabe: “So the fact that Fianna Faill has stopped you having mass and so forth in church and when you try to do a leaflet on instructions on how to do the Rosary, This Fianna Faill man describes it as the beginning of a police state. So you tell me, does that makes sense to you? This is what I’m asking the Taoiseach”

[15:59] The leaflets state there is no proof that shows social distancing works. HSE said this in C850. (Freedom of information)

The leaflets state there is no proof that the vaccines work. HSE also said this in C851.

The leaflets state there is no proof that the vaccines are safe. HSE also said this in C852.

The leaflets state that there is no proof that the virus exists. Well once again the HSE said this in C839.

The leaflets state that there is no proof that lockdowns in general work. The HSE said this in C846.

Gabe: “Fianna Faill say that these leaflets are the beginning of a police state because of the misinformation on these leaflets that the HSE is also saying. The letter goes on to say” [18:27]

The leaflets also state that there is no proof that elderly lockdowns work. Well once again the HSE said this in C847.

The leaflets state that there is no proof that masks work. Well once again the HSE said this in C848.

Gabe: “So if a doctor or someone else tells you that you must wear a mask, then you can show them a printed copy of FOI C848.”

The leaflets state that there is no proof that masks are safe. Well once again the HSE said this in C849.

Gabe: “So this also applies to police officers and shopkeepers, they are not in a position to be giving you medical advice on wearing a mask because they don’t know your medical conditions. You could be a person with some bad kind of asthma and you could pass out and be badly injured or potentially die from wearing a mask. The person giving the instruction to wear the mask would be legally liable. Only a GP can give you medical advise you, and this must be in private.”

25th December (Letter continued)

The only thing missing from the leaflets was the latest data from the CDC VAERS database. Vaccine adverse event reporting system.

I sent an earlier copy of this to you on the 25th December, the health minister and all other party TDs and health boards as part of the legal medical application that you must suspend vaccine roll out and save lives. This was 3 days before roll out of the vaccine.

Today’s figures state that from December 14th 2020 to march 1st 2021 a total of 1,381 deaths have occurred in USA from Covid-19 vaccines. This is also inline with the HSE FOI C852 in relation to proof of vaccine safety.

This latest data in combination along with the earlier data was all sent to the EMA.

On the 25th of December the Dáil and NPHET started a rollout of the vaccine and stated that it was “safe, tested and no deaths”. This was after they had read the certified reports of the 1,381 deaths from vaccination.

The CDC also state that on the 15th January 2021 that both the CDC and the FDA confirmed that Anaphylaxis reactions are severe and life threatening. 71% of these reactions can occur within 15 minutes after the vaccination. Now the EMA records note that I also advised you the Taoiseach of this issue on the 25th of December.

Now once again you hid all these risks from the public, this in my opinion is genocide. In addition to my information not being made use of, instructions were given to most media platforms to remove this vital data from the public.

[26:10] The CDC database also confirms that 72% of vaccines deaths have actually occurred from the product being given to people who are 65% or older. Again the records confirm that I advised you the Taoiseach and the health minister that those over 65 should not take the vaccine as most people over this age will have allergies.

When I advised the UK medicals of this, they listened to my advise and issued public warning that they must not take these products if they have allergies. But the Taoiseach and the HSE refused to warn the elderly and instructed the media to remove my information.

Gabe: “We’ll leave the Taoiseach letter there, there is lots more there but you might fall asleep. I have to give the facts straight to you that’s why the letters are so long.”

Leo Varadkar Celebrity Antics

[29:30] Gabe: Leo Varadkar basically said on TV that he was now going to arrange for 2000 euro fines and all sorts of nasty things if people want to travel in and out of the airport. He waffled away along with the Justice minister on all these new laws that they’ve made in the Dail. What they haven’t told you is that they are not really laws.

In another example he recently went on the media to comment about a case that was in the high court where electrical contractors were making the case that they had rights under the constitution to pay their staff whatever wages whatever they want.

The government had decided to pass a law saying that the contractors would have to pay a certain amount and that the constitution didn’t matter. The electrical contractors decided they would go to the high court for their rights under the constitution. They won the case.

Leo Varadkar went on television and said “We are appealing this high court decision to the supreme court and I’m telling all you electrical contractors that you cannot lower the wages until the outcome of this case in the supreme court is decided”. This is correct, you have to wait for the decision in the supreme court before the legislation is law.

Now you must now be aware of the public case put forward by Gemma O’Doherty and John Waters. They went through the high court recently and the high court said that they had no evidence that the case is valid. So within the legal system John and Gemma are currently appealing the high court decision in the supreme court.

Now the Dail will have to wait legally until the supreme court hear John and Gemma’s case and decide if it is a valid case or not. You can’t have laws for one set of people and then different laws for the other people. Mr Varadkar has forgotten that we have a constitution that applies to judges, police and ordinary people.

Mr Varadkar has made a fool of himself because he now has to wait. It becomes even more amusing because a colleague of mine has recently won a top case in the Dutch courts. It was established as part of EU law. The Irish government copied their legislation from what they did in Holland.

The Dutch courts ruled that they must lift this legislation straight away and that that it is illegal to implement such restrictions in the airports.

The best thing that Leo Varadkar can hope for from a legal point of view is that no one takes him to court for contempt of court for what he said. The attorney general may also be implicated because we have have written letters where he confirms that he is the main principal legal adviser to the government.

Well the attorney has already advised us in the high courts for a recent Ryan Air case. The Attorney General has initiated an undertaking to justice in the high court, that the government would no longer pretend these Covid legislations are law but they are actually in contempt of the high court if they pretend that the restrictions are law.

They are not laws, they are subject to the supreme court. The young lady McEntee thought she was being very smart when she introduced a new piece of legislation called Amendment 2021 to the existing Covid restrictions. You can’t amend it because the original amendment is still being decided in the supreme court whether it is law or not.

And that’s why recently due to my own bits and pieces of letters and objections that the Attorney General was called through to the high court to explain the governments position on the Ryan Air case and they clarified it quite nicely. They said that all travel restrictions coming in and out of the country was simply advice with no legal obligation. So there should be no misunderstanding amongst the public or the police that all these things are voluntary.

With the Dutch court ruling, the judge was asked to comment and he made it quite clear that this EU law applies to all EU citizens. You see you can’t have your cake and eat it too Mr Dáil. You are not just dealing anymore with Irish law. And has been said in the Dutch courts, it is illegal to do that, it is purely voluntary.

Under our own constitution laws, we would have to have a referendum if we wanted to agree on people coming in and out of the airport to be forced into a quarantine situation.

[38:30] By signing this quarantine legislation the President of Ireland has actually helped the Irish people with the forthcoming legal case. He now confessed to committing perjury and treason.

He is not aloud to sign that document because the legislation relating to Covid in the current circumstance where there is currently a case brought before the supreme court, they have to wait until that case is decided. This is the amended legislation to the Covid bill, that’s what they are talking about.

The Covid bill expired in the sunset clause last November even though it was still in the court with John and Gemma. It actually legally expired and there was no legal way of extending it because you can’t extend something that’s not been decided in the supreme court as being legal.

The president should have well known because he has my letters. I explained to him back in March that he also committed treason and perjury when he signed the Covid Bill back in March 2020. He signed the bill with the full knowledge because I had already written to him. The full knowledge is that the senate (which is a second chamber) had signed that bill already before he signed it. He would have known that the senate is not fit for purpose last March because it is only became fit for purpose on June 26th 2020 when the new Taoiseach appointed the 11 seats required.

When the president dissolved the Dáil at the beginning of last year, it meant that we should have had elections for the senate and the Dáil. Yes we elected senators for the senate, but not the 11 seats. They were empty.

The senate was not fit for purpose, until June 26th. When I told that to the government they were so worried they actually had 10 senators that could actually challenge this in the high court. A panel of 3 high court judges said to the senators that you shouldn’t be wasting the high courts time, that it is quite clear that in the constitution that the 11 seats have to be filled before it is fit for purpose.

The senators thought they could be smart by trying to get around this and get the judges to cover for them but the judges did they their job, they were honest.

Now I want to explain that there is a ring within the court system and the Garda. Unfortunately this ring of bad people are not only making things bad for the Irish people but also the Garda. If this corruption continues when the next government is formed, the first action will be to close the contract of the CCJ, this is the court system.

Law is actually more simple than you think.The CCJ court service is a registered company just like the Dáil. So if the majority of the people decide that the current system is corrupt, then we will have a vote and create a new contract with the service provider.

There is a group called Integrity Ireland that has a plan to replace this very corrupt system. This may need to be done with the police as well. We have good people in the police fore but their reputation is being damaged by these people who are in it.

We have a police commissioner that is policing under the UK system where they don’t have a constitution. This man might be confused because this is the Republic of Ireland where we have a constitution. Which is the main subject that I want to talk about.

[44:34] And just summarise, the president also knew that 112 TDs were banned last March from this vote on Covid legislation in the Dail. There Dail chairperson Ceann Comhairle (who has possible connections to the Chinese Communist Party), he sent out letters to the TDs about this meeting in March. He told them that it was to be a debate and not a vote. So believe it or not but 112 TDs agreed to be banned from the meeting. This means that 3/4 of the population of Ireland were not represented at all in the Dail when this Covid Bill passed.

So if you receive any fines for travelling abroad, they will be cancelled null and void because 3/4 of the electorate vote were banned from having any say. This man had no legal power to ban 112 TDs from the Dáil, he could actually go to jail. It was the head chair of the Dáil that wrote to all these people.

Because it was a care taker government, it had no legal power to ban 112 TDs. When the meeting took place it turned into a vote for the Covid Bill. What many people don’t seem to understand (which is written in the Dail records) is that they had a couple of votes. You never pass a bill on the 1st vote because it is to give TDs an opportunity to have 2nd thoughts. The important vote is what’s called the “Final Reading” but the amazing thing is that this final reading never took place. The point I’m trying to make is that the bill the President signed was not actually properly voted on in March 2020.

I want to remind you that the President would’ve known that

  1. the senate was not fit for purpose because of my letters that were sent, which means that he would’ve known that the bill was not signed legally.
  2. he would’ve also known that it was illegal for 112 TDs (3/4) to be banned
  3. the bill was not properly voted on because there was no final reading

When I wrote to the President asking about this, he replied saying something to effect “I can’t do anything now because I’ve signed it”.

I’ve got other interesting paperwork. I have a signed letter from the President about John and Gemma’s case.

I got it confirmed in writing where he confirmed my understanding that “All Irish citizens, as is written in the constitution can challenge a bill that may be repugnant”. You don’t need to have medical qualifications.

I wrote to the Judge and I have his letters as well, he told me that he couldn’t comment on my question because the matter is yet to be decided in the courts. So just like how the Covid legislation is yet to be decided in the courts. The President has made a fool of himself because he has given me more information to put him and his like in jail.

The Main Subject: The Constitution

[54:54] The constitution begins with you the people. Your rights to walk on the footpath, to make medical decisions for yourself, to have free speech, these are all safe under the constitution. You need to ask for those rights however.

You have to ask yourself the question, do you want to live in a UK based system where your rights are before parliament or do you want to stick to the constitution? You the people are the constitution and it is your constitution that can only be changed by you in a referendum.

You will lose these rights if you volunteer to give them up. This is wear the police and the Dáil are trying to trick you into giving up your rights. I listen to the terrible things that the police are telling these people is law. I was able to see the pattern because the same fraudulent documents kept coming up each time.

One example would be the old man sitting on a bus. So when the policemen approached him and started asking him for his personal details and stating that you can’t travel more than 5km.

All the old man needed to say nice and politely to them was “can you confirm for me that you are a Garda under oath?”. If the policeman said yes he is. Then all you have to say is “I’m asking you now to uphold my rights to travel on a lawful journey on the bus and not ask me anymore questions”. That’s it, full stop. You don’t have to have any further conversation because a shut mouth catches no flies. The police can not interrogate you under your rights in the constitution. Their oath is to uphold and protect the constitution, not NPHET or Dáil laws.

So rather than having an argument and maybe losing your cool and things go wrong. Just be nice and polite “I want my rights under the constitution, I have nothing more to say”.

If the policeman wants to take it further and arrest you, once again be polite but firm. Explain to them (the words are important) “I do not understand any charge“. In the language of the court “understandmeans that you are accepting the charges. In this case you have given a voluntary invitation for the court to chat with you.

The only time a policeman can send you to court is if you commit criminal offence such as assaulting a person. Anything relating to fines such as “did you walk 5 or 6 km” is a civil matter. They can only get you into court on a contract, because the court works on contract law.

If you say simply “I do not understand“, in legal terms it simply mean “I do not accept any charges”. That’s why the words have to be very clear. “I do not understand”.

Also if they do try to arrest you, the correct words are “I do not consent to unlawful arrest, and if I am detained my fee is 1000 euro an hour“. This is all perfectly legal. So if the police decide to arrest you on a civil matter that you refuse to accept. That policeman is actually breaking the law and he will have to pay you 1000 euro an hour.

The policeman is breaking your right to walk on the footpath but because he is also breaking his Garda oath, you can also charge him personally for 1000 euro an hour (not the Garda). This is because it is not the Garda that is actually arresting and unlawfully detaining you. You are only a Garda if you are under oath. So by removing a persons rights that is written on your passport to travel freely, this means you can fine the policeman personally and not the Garda.

One of the reasons why they try to refuse you a solicitor, (which they are actually required to give you). A solicitor would explain to you that because this is only a civil matter, you must not sign this recognisance document, by signing it you wave your rights that are in the constitution. This is a contract between you and the court. Your signature states “Yes I accept what you are charging me with, I will appear before the court”. You are also signing that you will only be allowed out of the police station on a bail bond and that you undertake not to perform any other crimes, when in actual fact you haven’t committed any crime to begin with.

It’s what we call in the business the paper trip, it’s a similar trick that they apply to schools and health matters. They are not asking you to sign these paper for fun you see. They are asking you to sign these pieces of paper to give up your rights. You must understand that the courts make enormous money out of this.

You just need to insist that you have committed no offence. You can also ask them “can you produce the piece of paper where I have signed away my rights under the constitution?”. They will not be able to do that and the same applies to all this fines nonsense.

I’ve heard horrible stories of police taking advantage of old people who are nervous, shocked and tired, where they have illegally under the EU charter of rights subjected them to torcher in the police stations and sometimes locked the elderly up in cells on no charge at all. They say to the elderly who they know are scared “If you don’t sign this piece of paper, we’re keeping you in for as long as it takes”.

Even if you were tricked into signing that piece of paper, it can be explained to a judge through letters worded the right way that you were tricked into this document, that it was not explained to you that it was a voluntary contract to go to court.

When the judge treats the people like they are garbage “keep quiet, you can’t talk”, that judge can go to jail. He is under oath just like the Garda, his oath is “If you agree to go to court, the judge has to protect your rights under the constitution”. So if the policeman is telling the Judge that you have been behaving badly, you have a legal presumption of innocence. The judge must give you the opportunity to respond to what the policeman has said and to provide evidence if you have it that the policeman lied.

What’s happening at the moment is that the policeman is telling the judge that this individual was behaving badly and then the defendant would have the chance to show a video that it was actually the opposite. The judge snaps at the defendant “You stand in the corner and say nothing, this is between me and the policeman”. This is what I want to get into on our later streams, how our excellent court system was been corrupted. We no longer have public courts, we have police courts. The courts are used an instrument of punishment by the police. It is no longer about justice.

I do believe in the system, and I do believe it can be repaired, but everyone needs to become lawyers which is simple, it is not as difficult as you think. It is just the lawyers that twist it to make it sound more complicated that it is.

[01:09:49]

CUC

I do not consent

I dont not understand

I have no contract with you

and…

If you arrest me with a pretend charge then my fee is €1000 an hour

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create your website with WordPress.com
Get started
%d bloggers like this: